Difference between revisions of "Talk:MediaWikiLite"
From Organic Design wiki
(Couple of questions...) |
(→Debian package) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Debian package== | ==Debian package== | ||
| − | I wonder how far we are from having a mediawikilite debian package that installs dependencies (e.g. php5+sqlite+nanoweb) and runs "out of the box". It could significantly increase the number of users if Debian and Ubuntu users were only one apt-get away using mediawikilite. Are there any technical hurdles? [[User:Parker|Parker]] 11:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | + | I wonder how far we are from having a mediawikilite debian package that installs dependencies (e.g. php5+sqlite+nanoweb) and runs "out of the box". It could significantly increase the number of users if Debian and Ubuntu users were only one apt-get away from using mediawikilite. Are there any technical hurdles? [[User:Parker|Parker]] 11:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:33, 26 May 2010
Portability
I have long been using mediawiki with a LAMP stack as a personal and home wiki. One of the main inconveniences is that it's not easy to move the wiki around to another machine. It involves dumping the database, copying various files etc. Is Mediawikilite more portable? Parker 11:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Debian package
I wonder how far we are from having a mediawikilite debian package that installs dependencies (e.g. php5+sqlite+nanoweb) and runs "out of the box". It could significantly increase the number of users if Debian and Ubuntu users were only one apt-get away from using mediawikilite. Are there any technical hurdles? Parker 11:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
