Difference between revisions of "Talk:Project Summary"
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 23:19, 27 September 2005
I agree with the below. As the summary is the public statement of purpose it should realy be arrived at off-line then published when everybody is happy. I don't wish to neglect the wider scope of what we are doing either.
- Rob 11:19, 28 Sep 2005 (NZST)
We should just discuss any ideas first here then make changes - I don't really care what it says, but I suppose it's just a general principle to avoid problems, especially one day when there's many more people editing - like on the 'pedia :-)
We probably do need to work out a better layout though, so we can have some actual information about the project rather than just links - but not pushing the links off...
- Nad 10:26, 27 Sep 2005 (NZST)
Rob, I think it's good to talk about the universal OS type aspect, but the project is about more than that. I actually think it would be good to add this bit to what was there before. We all have individual aspects that we are working on but we should find a consensus regarding what the big picture is that we are working towards. In that sense, what Aran wrote before resonated more with me.
- Milan 15:22, 26 Sep 2005 (NZST)
