Difference between revisions of "11 November 2013"
(News: Bitgroup - a P2P groupware project) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{news|title=Bitgroup - a P2P groupware project|img=|msg= | {{news|title=Bitgroup - a P2P groupware project|img=|msg= | ||
| − | [[File:Bitgroup.svg|150px|right]]Organic Design has begun developing a new project called [http://www.bitgroup.org Bitgroup] which is a [[peer-to-peer]] group-ware and social-network application based on [[Bitmessage]]. It allows groups to communicate and organise [[security|securely]] and [[privacy|privately]] without the need for centralised servers which can be shut down or compromised. It's also designed to work effectively in areas that have very limited or intermittent internet capabilities, and will eventually be able to work without internet at all by using local networks and removable media as it's transport mechanism. | + | [[File:Bitgroup.svg|150px|right]]Organic Design has begun developing a new project called [http://www.bitgroup.org Bitgroup] which is a [[peer-to-peer]] group-ware and social-network application based on [[Bitmessage]]. It allows groups to communicate and organise [[security|securely]] and [[privacy|privately]] without the need for centralised servers which can be shut down or compromised. It's also designed to work effectively in areas that have very limited or intermittent internet capabilities, and will eventually be able to work without internet at all by using local networks and removable media as it's transport mechanism. {{more|http://www.bitgroup.org}} |
A private P2P framework is essential in our view, but there's also many other things that we at Organic Design have found to be invaluable tools to have available in a decentralised groupware framework, such as support for [[workflow]] and [[contract]] oriented organisation, [[trust group]]s and the prioritisation of the [[w:sneakernet|sneakernet]] and [[mesh]]ing support to name a few. We have so many specific needs and ideas that we'd like to experiment with ourselves, that having our own peer-to-peer groupware framework is the best way forward for us even if there may be some other systems that are more mature or better in some respects. | A private P2P framework is essential in our view, but there's also many other things that we at Organic Design have found to be invaluable tools to have available in a decentralised groupware framework, such as support for [[workflow]] and [[contract]] oriented organisation, [[trust group]]s and the prioritisation of the [[w:sneakernet|sneakernet]] and [[mesh]]ing support to name a few. We have so many specific needs and ideas that we'd like to experiment with ourselves, that having our own peer-to-peer groupware framework is the best way forward for us even if there may be some other systems that are more mature or better in some respects. | ||
| − | + | '''See also:''' | |
*[http://www.bitgroup.org Bitgroup wiki] | *[http://www.bitgroup.org Bitgroup wiki] | ||
*[[Bitmessage]] | *[[Bitmessage]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:21, 10 November 2013
|
Bitgroup - a P2P groupware project
Organic Design has begun developing a new project called Bitgroup which is a peer-to-peer group-ware and social-network application based on Bitmessage. It allows groups to communicate and organise securely and privately without the need for centralised servers which can be shut down or compromised. It's also designed to work effectively in areas that have very limited or intermittent internet capabilities, and will eventually be able to work without internet at all by using local networks and removable media as it's transport mechanism. [more...]
A private P2P framework is essential in our view, but there's also many other things that we at Organic Design have found to be invaluable tools to have available in a decentralised groupware framework, such as support for workflow and contract oriented organisation, trust groups and the prioritisation of the sneakernet and meshing support to name a few. We have so many specific needs and ideas that we'd like to experiment with ourselves, that having our own peer-to-peer groupware framework is the best way forward for us even if there may be some other systems that are more mature or better in some respects.
See also:
