Difference between revisions of "27 December 2007"
(Server Resource Concerns) |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{news|title=Server Resource Concerns|img=|msg= | {{news|title=Server Resource Concerns|img=|msg= | ||
| − | The responsiveness of our the sites on our [[w:VPS|VPS]] has been steadily declining over the past few months even though our resource usage has remained steady. I've notified our host ([http://www.vpslinkk.com VPSLink]) who have been able to temporarily fix the problems. After the responsiveness dropped again over the Christmas period I notified them again and they've moved us onto a new physical server with less clients on it | + | The responsiveness of our the sites on our [[w:VPS|VPS]] has been steadily declining over the past few months even though our resource usage has remained steady. I've notified our host ([http://www.vpslinkk.com VPSLink]) who have been able to temporarily fix the problems. After the responsiveness dropped again over the Christmas period I notified them again and they've moved us onto a new physical server with less clients on it. This should alleviate the problem for a while, but I fear it's a trend that stems from the fact that VPSlink don't offer a guarantee of maximum clients per physical server, or minimum available MHz of CPU capacity. I'm currently researching other VPS hosts who do offer guarantees on those aspects which should give a more consistent level of performance. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:58, 26 December 2007
|
Server Resource Concerns
The responsiveness of our the sites on our VPS has been steadily declining over the past few months even though our resource usage has remained steady. I've notified our host (VPSLink) who have been able to temporarily fix the problems. After the responsiveness dropped again over the Christmas period I notified them again and they've moved us onto a new physical server with less clients on it. This should alleviate the problem for a while, but I fear it's a trend that stems from the fact that VPSlink don't offer a guarantee of maximum clients per physical server, or minimum available MHz of CPU capacity. I'm currently researching other VPS hosts who do offer guarantees on those aspects which should give a more consistent level of performance.
