Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiki Jam"
From Organic Design wiki
(if content not ready, then we're not ready to do it yet) |
(basics not needed, but "wiki organisation" workshop needed) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I saw that but wanted to do something separate because that [[MediaWiki Workshop]] article does not seem like it's headed toward creating a template for setting up the kind of event we were talking about. I see mainly workshop content ideas. Apart from that, wiki jam is supposed to be something for experienced wiki contributors and developers on organic design to collaborate on a range of issues, beyond the scope of strictly MediaWiki Workshop content development and testing.--[[User:Milan|Milan]] 22:54, 27 December 2007 (NZDT) | :I saw that but wanted to do something separate because that [[MediaWiki Workshop]] article does not seem like it's headed toward creating a template for setting up the kind of event we were talking about. I see mainly workshop content ideas. Apart from that, wiki jam is supposed to be something for experienced wiki contributors and developers on organic design to collaborate on a range of issues, beyond the scope of strictly MediaWiki Workshop content development and testing.--[[User:Milan|Milan]] 22:54, 27 December 2007 (NZDT) | ||
::And also, I was put off adding to the article you mention because I think my additions would "lost" in the long list of content, it's got a lot of restructuring work pending - see discussion--[[User:Milan|Milan]] 23:01, 27 December 2007 (NZDT) | ::And also, I was put off adding to the article you mention because I think my additions would "lost" in the long list of content, it's got a lot of restructuring work pending - see discussion--[[User:Milan|Milan]] 23:01, 27 December 2007 (NZDT) | ||
| − | ::: | + | :::Splitting into two articles is fine, but we need the workshop content to be ready too. If the content is suffering from being a disorganised list then its shows that we're not ready for a group session yet. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 23:10, 27 December 2007 (NZDT) |
| + | ::::We don't need the first stage of the workshop for ourselves, but we need some of the advanced stage, and the general structure of the "wiki organisation" one ready. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 23:17, 27 December 2007 (NZDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 27 December 2007
I already started some notes for this in MediaWiki Workshop since it's going to need to be based on that, so probably best to merge with that.
- I saw that but wanted to do something separate because that MediaWiki Workshop article does not seem like it's headed toward creating a template for setting up the kind of event we were talking about. I see mainly workshop content ideas. Apart from that, wiki jam is supposed to be something for experienced wiki contributors and developers on organic design to collaborate on a range of issues, beyond the scope of strictly MediaWiki Workshop content development and testing.--Milan 22:54, 27 December 2007 (NZDT)
- And also, I was put off adding to the article you mention because I think my additions would "lost" in the long list of content, it's got a lot of restructuring work pending - see discussion--Milan 23:01, 27 December 2007 (NZDT)
- Splitting into two articles is fine, but we need the workshop content to be ready too. If the content is suffering from being a disorganised list then its shows that we're not ready for a group session yet. --Nad 23:10, 27 December 2007 (NZDT)
- We don't need the first stage of the workshop for ourselves, but we need some of the advanced stage, and the general structure of the "wiki organisation" one ready. --Nad 23:17, 27 December 2007 (NZDT)
- Splitting into two articles is fine, but we need the workshop content to be ready too. If the content is suffering from being a disorganised list then its shows that we're not ready for a group session yet. --Nad 23:10, 27 December 2007 (NZDT)
- And also, I was put off adding to the article you mention because I think my additions would "lost" in the long list of content, it's got a lot of restructuring work pending - see discussion--Milan 23:01, 27 December 2007 (NZDT)
