Difference between revisions of "Talk:Single Page Application"
From Organic Design wiki
Infomaniac (talk | contribs) (→Hash fragments) |
(→Hash fragments: see corMVC) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Am I missing something? | Am I missing something? | ||
Granted, almost all of the above are based on the same tiddlywiki technology, except the last, which appears to be a rewrite from scratch. --[[User:Infomaniac|Infomaniac]] 12:02, 21 November 2011 (PST) | Granted, almost all of the above are based on the same tiddlywiki technology, except the last, which appears to be a rewrite from scratch. --[[User:Infomaniac|Infomaniac]] 12:02, 21 November 2011 (PST) | ||
| + | :No it's Tiddly that's missing something :( see corMVC demo and his lecture in the SPA article for info about the proper way of implementing it --[[User:Nad|nad]] 07:03, 22 November 2011 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 22 November 2011
Hash fragments
I have observed that the following SPA's do not have URI-addressable internal pages (hash fragments):
- http://www.tiddlywiki.com/
- http://mgsd-docs.tiddlyspace.com/
- http://nathanbowers.com/gtdtw/
- http://www.dcubed.ca/Welcome_to_d-cubed.html
- http://www.checkettsweb.com/tw/gtd_tiddlywiki.htm (gtd+)
- http://mgsd.tiddlyspot.com/demo3.html (Monkey GTD > mGSD)
- http://tiddlyguv.com/
- http://www.tiddlywiki.com/tiddlywiki5/
Am I missing something? Granted, almost all of the above are based on the same tiddlywiki technology, except the last, which appears to be a rewrite from scratch. --Infomaniac 12:02, 21 November 2011 (PST)
- No it's Tiddly that's missing something :( see corMVC demo and his lecture in the SPA article for info about the proper way of implementing it --nad 07:03, 22 November 2011 (PST)
