Difference between revisions of "Ardeshir Mehta"
From Organic Design wiki
Infomaniac (talk | contribs) (File Logical Invalidity of Einstein's Train Thought-Experiment.pdf attached) |
Infomaniac (talk | contribs) (→Ardeshir Mehta) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* [http://www.scribd.com/doc/23153455/Essay-on-Geometry Essay on Geometry] on the impossibility of n>3 orthogonal directions, n>3 space, non-euclidean geometry (in nature) {{to do|task=find page reference}} | * [http://www.scribd.com/doc/23153455/Essay-on-Geometry Essay on Geometry] on the impossibility of n>3 orthogonal directions, n>3 space, non-euclidean geometry (in nature) {{to do|task=find page reference}} | ||
:''to critically examine and ... refute the logical validity of a large part of what is commonly understood to be “geometry” — especially much of what passes for non-Euclidean geometry, as well as the so-called “geometry” used in the Theory of Relativity.'' | :''to critically examine and ... refute the logical validity of a large part of what is commonly understood to be “geometry” — especially much of what passes for non-Euclidean geometry, as well as the so-called “geometry” used in the Theory of Relativity.'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | i) [http://web.archive.org/web/20080324105743/http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/CredoEinstein%27sTrain/CredoEinstein%27sTrain.html Critique] of Prof. Bryan Luther's Web Article [http://web.archive.org/web/20080324105743/http://www.cord.edu/dept/physics/credo/etrain_2000.html Credo: Einstein's Train] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
[[Category:Maths]] | [[Category:Maths]] | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 6 July 2012
Ardeshir Mehta
- Relativity Index (archive)
- Essay on Geometry on the impossibility of n>3 orthogonal directions, n>3 space, non-euclidean geometry (in nature) To Do: find page reference
- to critically examine and ... refute the logical validity of a large part of what is commonly understood to be “geometry” — especially much of what passes for non-Euclidean geometry, as well as the so-called “geometry” used in the Theory of Relativity.
i) Critique of Prof. Bryan Luther's Web Article Credo: Einstein's Train
Attachments
- File:Logical Invalidity of Einstein's Train Thought-Experiment.pdf
- File:Simultaneity In Special Relativity - 3.pdf
- File:Simultaneity In Special Relativity - 2.pdf
- File:Simultaneity In Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Yet Another Simple Argument Against Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Another Simple Argument Against Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Short Reductio-ad-Absurdum Refutation of Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Simple Challenge to Supporters of Special Relativity.pdf
- File:SingleBestArgumentAgainstSpecialRelativity.pdf
- File:SymmetricalTwinParadox.pdf
- [[:File:]]