Difference between revisions of "Ardeshir Mehta"
From Organic Design wiki
Infomaniac (talk | contribs) |
Infomaniac (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Attachments == | == Attachments == | ||
| + | *[[:File:Einstein's Train Thought Experiment Contradicts the Theory of Relativity.pdf]] | ||
*[[:File:Einstein's Train Thought Experiment Itself Disproves the Theory of Relativity.pdf]] | *[[:File:Einstein's Train Thought Experiment Itself Disproves the Theory of Relativity.pdf]] | ||
*[[:File:Logical Invalidity of Einstein's Train Thought-Experiment.pdf]] | *[[:File:Logical Invalidity of Einstein's Train Thought-Experiment.pdf]] | ||
Revision as of 01:50, 6 July 2012
Ardeshir Mehta
- Relativity Index (archive)
- Essay on Geometry on the impossibility of n>3 orthogonal directions, n>3 space, non-euclidean geometry (in nature) To Do: find page reference
- to critically examine and ... refute the logical validity of a large part of what is commonly understood to be “geometry” — especially much of what passes for non-Euclidean geometry, as well as the so-called “geometry” used in the Theory of Relativity.
i) Critique of Prof. Bryan Luther's Web Article Credo: Einstein's Train
Attachments
- File:Einstein's Train Thought Experiment Contradicts the Theory of Relativity.pdf
- File:Einstein's Train Thought Experiment Itself Disproves the Theory of Relativity.pdf
- File:Logical Invalidity of Einstein's Train Thought-Experiment.pdf
- File:Simultaneity In Special Relativity - 3.pdf
- File:Simultaneity In Special Relativity - 2.pdf
- File:Simultaneity In Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Yet Another Simple Argument Against Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Another Simple Argument Against Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Short Reductio-ad-Absurdum Refutation of Special Relativity.pdf
- File:Simple Challenge to Supporters of Special Relativity.pdf
- File:SingleBestArgumentAgainstSpecialRelativity.pdf
- File:SymmetricalTwinParadox.pdf
- [[:File:]]
