Difference between revisions of "Talk:WikiTeX music and schematics"

From Organic Design wiki
(embeds don't work on my FF or IE)
(Geda)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 
::::Well I added [[auto-play.php]] to [[view]], which converts the link to the above syntax, but it doesn't work on my IE, and on mozilla tries to download a quicktime pluggin which fails to install saying it's corrupted :-( --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 23:14, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)
 
::::Well I added [[auto-play.php]] to [[view]], which converts the link to the above syntax, but it doesn't work on my IE, and on mozilla tries to download a quicktime pluggin which fails to install saying it's corrupted :-( --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 23:14, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)
 +
 +
== Geda ==
 +
 +
Great job on getting Geda working; that was a little plum in the source for literate programmers.
 +
 +
If you come across a more efficient package for doing schematics, let me know.

Revision as of 14:04, 4 February 2007

do you need to update Special:Version with these mods? --Phalseid 21:51, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)


Now we just need MIDI! --Rob 22:30, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)

Doesn't the downloadable midi link come up on yours? --Nad 22:32, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)
yes, but I missed it first time around. Can we embed the media plugin in the page rather than going to a new blank page? --Rob 22:35, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)
It must be something wrong with your settings because on mine it just plays it with whatever your local app is - but since its just a midi, I'm sure it could be embedded in whatever the usual way is pretty easily, just need to know the html/object tag or whatever... --Nad 22:38, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)
<EMBED src="file.mid" autostart=true loop=false volume=100 hidden=true><NOEMBED><BGSOUND src="file.mid"></NOEMBED>
Well I added auto-play.php to view, which converts the link to the above syntax, but it doesn't work on my IE, and on mozilla tries to download a quicktime pluggin which fails to install saying it's corrupted :-( --Nad 23:14, 29 Jan 2007 (NZST)

Geda

Great job on getting Geda working; that was a little plum in the source for literate programmers.

If you come across a more efficient package for doing schematics, let me know.