Difference between revisions of "Talk:Platform roadmap"

From Organic Design wiki
(removed banter; Added notes for revamp)
m (→‎Notes for revamp of Platform)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
*working model/coop model
 
*working model/coop model
 
*used to support things, give them stability, or visibility:
 
*used to support things, give them stability, or visibility:
−
== Notes for revamp of Platform ==
 
−
These notes are regarding a concept that is a work in-progress and are to help guide the development of such an organisation on the Organic Design Wiki. A functioning platform would be an example of an [[Open Organisation]]. The question of how to set up a platform arises for people [[on the path]] when they want to surround themselves with others that are on the path to decrease their stress and increase their opportunities and companionship. What form can the living and or working arrangements take to ensure a smooth and harmonious interchange? This is no trivial question, experience has shown us that when communities or teams of any size fail to address it properly, stress, alienation and financial mismanagement are all too common.
 
−
 
−
For people on the path, the next order of magnitude for organisation up from personal organisation is the platform. Historically this unit has been provided by the family, in modern times this could be looked at more like a team of like-minded people living and/or working together. The platform is a form of collaboration that includes elements of teamwork, flatting and self-employment, but what sets it apart from the contexts mentioned is that is that it is based on people coming together with clearly shared values using decentralised forms of organisation to get things done. It is also different in that it features a strong emphasis on life and work integration, the idea is that people with various interest and abilities come together so that each of them might do what they are most interested in, supported by the other group members. This can work if there is a clear shared awareness of roles and members are selected based on filling gaps in the teams spectrum of abilities.
 
−
 
−
The idea is that by having organisation in place, many things that can be quite the chore to do or expensive to access for individuals, such as a car or ensuring there is always fresh and healthy food on the table, can be provided by the larger group, thus allowing the individuals to focus more fully on whatever they are good at and enjoy doing. Furthermore, by having a group of well-organised people that are able to work together over time may opportunities may be developed and brought to fruition, allowing the group as a whole to act as a freelance service provider, meaning opportunity and cash-flow is created "in-house", in accord with the values of the group, thus thus allowing the members to overcome the challenge of "right livelihood".
 
−
 
−
Of course this way of working would be flexible and could be adapted by flats, companies, families or mixtures of these kinds of groupings to add as many or few of these elements as desired.
 
−
 
−
*The next order of magnitude is a group of platforms that may form larger organisations together as the need or desire arises amongst the members. This would lead to the organic formation of sanctuaries.
 

Revision as of 11:54, 15 June 2008

Related work

Platform/Examples

  • Why IT Support currently sucks and takes time. As opposed to setting up a streamlined process and workspaces.
  • Accounts - fragmented, hard to set up, how would you manage multiple branches, records maintentance. Or easy to set up from templates with guidance, plus unification.
  • Organisation - todo lists are hard to keep track of, confusion over roles, accounts, compare that to having a unified inbox, which combines the functionality of email, recentchanges, and spreadsheet
i would differntiate between "ToDo" and "Schedule" the same way that Covey does: "TODO's" relate to and move you towards your main goals in your roles. "Schedule" is appointments, etc. Maybe we don't confine this globally (ok, of course we don't) but this is how i will use it. I will also make it so my TODO is only visable for a portion of the day, the portion of the day when i am scheduled to do my TODO. --Phalseid 06:48, 12 Jul 2006 (NZST)

Platform/Philosophy

  • Google comparison "Search, don't file" vs. Filters that are refined over time - workspaces.
  • Information Organisation - things are placed and displayed in context.
  • Analogy - books thrown on floor with sophisticated robots to sift through pile vs. "the library way"
  • Infinite growth vs. the sustainable way. The platforms have no interest in eternal growth. they seek to simply reflect the needs of the community and act to meet those needs via the provision of products, services and organisation itself.

Platform/Sanctuary

  • Google have got their technology parks, they realise that a nice campus environment where all needs of the employees can be met will lead to happy productive and creative employees. we want to create a technology park template which will form a network of all the instances in use. We refer to this as "Sanctuary". We extend the platform notion slightly to integrate management of the natural environment and food production.
  • Gardens
  • Compost
  • Permaculture

Flower comments from summary

some q's and thoughts while writing a summary

  • what are the major elements of a platform?
  • why have a complete system?
  • what is a complete system?
  • holistic organisational systems -- whats that???
  • awareness
  • effective and efficient
  • working model/coop model
  • used to support things, give them stability, or visibility:
Retrieved from "https://organicdesign.nz/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Platform_roadmap&oldid=84194"