Difference between revisions of "Talk:Organic Design manifesto"

From Organic Design wiki
(response to Peder's manifestos)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The cluetrain is good, I have read that one.
 
The cluetrain is good, I have read that one.
  
However, none of the available manifesto's seem to address the issues that have and continue to come up, such as money and passive income, intellectual property, social sustainability and other topics related to the project. We will need to create something quite specific over the next few weeks. The ideas are all there, they just need to be streamlined and communicated effectively now.
+
However, none of the available manifesto's seem to address the issues that have and continue to come up, such as money and passive income, intellectual property, social sustainability and other topics related to The Project. We will need to create something quite specific over the next few weeks. The ideas are all there, they just need to be streamlined and communicated effectively now.
 
:--[[User:Milan|Milan]] 09:15, 7 Jun 2006 (NZST)
 
:--[[User:Milan|Milan]] 09:15, 7 Jun 2006 (NZST)

Revision as of 21:18, 6 June 2006

The cluetrain is good, I have read that one.

However, none of the available manifesto's seem to address the issues that have and continue to come up, such as money and passive income, intellectual property, social sustainability and other topics related to The Project. We will need to create something quite specific over the next few weeks. The ideas are all there, they just need to be streamlined and communicated effectively now.

--Milan 09:15, 7 Jun 2006 (NZST)