Difference between revisions of "Living Together/Table of content"

From Organic Design wiki
m
m (save point)
Line 56: Line 56:
 
*The [[w:Laws of thermodynamics|laws of thermodynamics]] apply to all systems including organisations, and should form the foundation of a definition of sustainability on which organisations are developed.
 
*The [[w:Laws of thermodynamics|laws of thermodynamics]] apply to all systems including organisations, and should form the foundation of a definition of sustainability on which organisations are developed.
 
*See [[w:Energy conservation|Energy conservation]] and [[w:Renewable energy|Renewable energy]]
 
*See [[w:Energy conservation|Energy conservation]] and [[w:Renewable energy|Renewable energy]]
### co-operation; create win-win situations
+
### co-operation and colaboration; create win-win situations
 
### transparency; share instead of hiding => open standard (incl. information)
 
### transparency; share instead of hiding => open standard (incl. information)
 
*info, knowledge and technology accessible for everyone
 
*info, knowledge and technology accessible for everyone
 +
*open source movement
 +
###reuse and utilisation - access not ownership
 +
*knowledge: no intelectual property => more time to improve and no need to work on the same things without sharing
 +
*resources: mex effective and eficient use (see [[w:Social capital|social capital]])
 
### p2p
 
### p2p
 
*network social and comp
 
*network social and comp
Line 71: Line 75:
 
## Roadmap - Transition periode
 
## Roadmap - Transition periode
 
###Sanctuaries
 
###Sanctuaries
 +
###wikipedia as an example for the new way of non-hirachic colaboration
 +
*p2p on a social level
 +
*freely accessible info for everybody
 +
*truely democratic
  
  

Revision as of 20:31, 27 November 2006

Aims

  • to write a paper which explains why the current systems or organisational ways of doing things don't work and what can be done instead.
  • analyse the current situation of global society and global political economic systems
  • show that the current problems can be solved by 'the project'


Structure

  1. Introduction


  1. Current Way of Living
    1. Philosophical Foundations
      1.  ???
      2. how do humans fit into the world?
    2. Social and Economic Systems
      1. Individualism
      2. Centralisation
      3. Democracy and Nation States
  • gov is taking care of us/ looking after us - e.g. welfare state
  • system of fixing instead of preventing. e.g. health, pest (here or into problems?)
      1. Bretton Woods

World Bank, IMF, BIS, Federal Reserve System, Fractional-reserve banking, Usury

      1. Free Markets
  • consumerism: goods, entertainment, information, relations...all areas
      1. Globalisation
    1. Occuring Problems
      1. intelectual property prevents re-use => re-inventing and parallel inventing => result is less then what it could be
  • only priviledged have access to certain info, knowledge and resources
  • hidden information -> unconcious about 'my impact' and what's happening
      1. profit
      1. competitive model with the aim for maximum profit rather then maximum harmony
  • against each other instead of together - win-loose instead of win-win
      1. few have heaps, lots have little
      1. rigid systems, little flexibility to react on new problems
      2. non-sustainable - exploitation of natural(incl human) resources
  • repair more expensive than buy new
  • polution


  1. A New Way of Living
    1. Philosophical Foundations
      1. everything is interconnected
    2. Social and Economic Systems
      1. Organisation
      1. Sustainability
      1. co-operation and colaboration; create win-win situations
      2. transparency; share instead of hiding => open standard (incl. information)
  • info, knowledge and technology accessible for everyone
  • open source movement
      1. reuse and utilisation - access not ownership
  • knowledge: no intelectual property => more time to improve and no need to work on the same things without sharing
  • resources: mex effective and eficient use (see social capital)
      1. p2p
      1. all aspects changeable
      1. think global, act local
  • Think global, act local
  • e.g. choose level of centralisation appropriated to situation/problem (water, energie, food)


    1. Roadmap - Transition periode
      1. Sanctuaries
      2. wikipedia as an example for the new way of non-hirachic colaboration
  • p2p on a social level
  • freely accessible info for everybody
  • truely democratic


  1. Conclusion


  1. Bibliography


  • points to go...somewhere:
    • communication
    • self-responsibility
    • prohibition
    • 'i just work here' mentality
    • common sense (definable?) vs. regulations/policy/law
    • ownership