Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dichotomy"

From Organic Design wiki
m (the general idea)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
The two domains article needs to focus on their generic nature - that they conceptually underpin all disciplines of knowledge and domains of perception, and identifying these domains is key to structuring concepts within a discipline. It's not the dichotomy of the small and the large, but of frequency vs time, momentum vs position, pattern vs instance, current vs voltage, change vs state, polar vs rectangular, wave vs particle - uncertainty, fourier analyasis, entropy are principles relating these two domains and so are applicable to all contexts that exhibit the two domains. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 21:48, 29 Aug 2006 (NZST)
+
The two domains article needs to focus on their generic nature - that they conceptually underpin all disciplines of knowledge and percevable comtexts, and identifying the two domains is key to structuring concepts within a given context. It's not the dichotomy of the small and the large, but of frequency vs time, momentum vs position, pattern vs instance, current vs voltage, change vs state, polar vs rectangular, wave vs particle - uncertainty, fourier analyasis, entropy are principles relating these two domains and so are applicable to all contexts that exhibit the two domains. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 21:48, 29 Aug 2006 (NZST)

Revision as of 09:50, 29 August 2006

The two domains article needs to focus on their generic nature - that they conceptually underpin all disciplines of knowledge and percevable comtexts, and identifying the two domains is key to structuring concepts within a given context. It's not the dichotomy of the small and the large, but of frequency vs time, momentum vs position, pattern vs instance, current vs voltage, change vs state, polar vs rectangular, wave vs particle - uncertainty, fourier analyasis, entropy are principles relating these two domains and so are applicable to all contexts that exhibit the two domains. --Nad 21:48, 29 Aug 2006 (NZST)