Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peer.c"
From Organic Design wiki
(I like this early movement to C) |
(we like c) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd be quite happy to drop the PERL version and just use C for the network-layer-peer instead (other lang-bindings can floww in their own time), it allows us to cut down the low-level dependencies a lot. The development road-map for achieving [[Migration Day]] only involves a minimal amount of work on the current PERL layer ([[nodal-wikid.pl]] or [[peerd]]), since all the interface work is being done from a "hardwired" nodal structure built into [[peer.as]]. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 11:09, 19 Jun 2006 (NZST) | I'd be quite happy to drop the PERL version and just use C for the network-layer-peer instead (other lang-bindings can floww in their own time), it allows us to cut down the low-level dependencies a lot. The development road-map for achieving [[Migration Day]] only involves a minimal amount of work on the current PERL layer ([[nodal-wikid.pl]] or [[peerd]]), since all the interface work is being done from a "hardwired" nodal structure built into [[peer.as]]. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 11:09, 19 Jun 2006 (NZST) | ||
| + | :Exactly: There's too many chickens and too many eggs! To have something that works without many and complex dependancies it seems c is the way to go. ''Hardwiring'' is only realy necessary where the language or our current enviorment does not support self-containment. With c the self-containment is always available because of the low-level data structures used. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 13:29, 19 Jun 2006 (NZST) | ||
Revision as of 01:29, 19 June 2006
I'd be quite happy to drop the PERL version and just use C for the network-layer-peer instead (other lang-bindings can floww in their own time), it allows us to cut down the low-level dependencies a lot. The development road-map for achieving Migration Day only involves a minimal amount of work on the current PERL layer (nodal-wikid.pl or peerd), since all the interface work is being done from a "hardwired" nodal structure built into peer.as. --Nad 11:09, 19 Jun 2006 (NZST)
- Exactly: There's too many chickens and too many eggs! To have something that works without many and complex dependancies it seems c is the way to go. Hardwiring is only realy necessary where the language or our current enviorment does not support self-containment. With c the self-containment is always available because of the low-level data structures used. --Rob 13:29, 19 Jun 2006 (NZST)
