Difference between revisions of "Talk:Install a SugarCRM"
From Organic Design wiki
m (oh.) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
for more, [http://www.google.com/search?q=sugarcrm+vs.+vtiger&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a sugarcrm vs. vtiger checkout google] for comparisons. | for more, [http://www.google.com/search?q=sugarcrm+vs.+vtiger&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a sugarcrm vs. vtiger checkout google] for comparisons. | ||
| − | regardless, the point is to have a tool that fits the process, not a process that fits the tool. the process is paramount, and since many of the tools out there are not process centric it leads to the mess we have for software currently. Vtiger does a good job of handling ACL, contacts, leads, workorders, sales, and invoices. it is | + | regardless, the point is to have a tool that fits the process, not a process that fits the tool. the process is paramount, and since many of the tools out there are not process centric it leads to the mess we have for software currently. Vtiger does a good job of handling ACL, contacts, leads, workorders, sales, and invoices. it is weak in process, workflow, and file management. |
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Remember that these processes are simply the documentation of our own procedures as they're required. Clients have wanted SugarCRM so I set it up for them and documented the procedure. --[[User:Nad|nad]] 17:41, 8 July 2008 (NZST) | ::Remember that these processes are simply the documentation of our own procedures as they're required. Clients have wanted SugarCRM so I set it up for them and documented the procedure. --[[User:Nad|nad]] 17:41, 8 July 2008 (NZST) | ||
| − | ::my bad --[[User:Phalseid|Phalseid]] 03:09, 9 July 2008 (NZST) | + | :::my bad --[[User:Phalseid|Phalseid]] 03:09, 9 July 2008 (NZST) |
Latest revision as of 15:27, 8 July 2008
might i suggest (again) vtiger in lieu of sugarcrm. the reasons for include:
- personal experience with vtiger installs and modifications
- extensive skin work already done in vtiger
for more, sugarcrm vs. vtiger checkout google for comparisons.
regardless, the point is to have a tool that fits the process, not a process that fits the tool. the process is paramount, and since many of the tools out there are not process centric it leads to the mess we have for software currently. Vtiger does a good job of handling ACL, contacts, leads, workorders, sales, and invoices. it is weak in process, workflow, and file management.
--Phalseid 15:46, 8 July 2008 (NZST)
- it does web to lead pretty good, but zoho does it better/easier --Phalseid 15:48, 8 July 2008 (NZST)
- Remember that these processes are simply the documentation of our own procedures as they're required. Clients have wanted SugarCRM so I set it up for them and documented the procedure. --nad 17:41, 8 July 2008 (NZST)
- my bad --Phalseid 03:09, 9 July 2008 (NZST)
