Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dashboard"
(moved to talk page) |
m (→GTD: moving to PM) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
A good idea, but not for this context - we already have very solid plans for interface and no time to deviate from that plan. The peer interface is widget-based but is more generic so that the same interface elements can be rendered directly to the screen on Linux environments, or via browser using flash. We've already done a lot of code for this, but we need [[peerd]] in place for any of this to be testable. | A good idea, but not for this context - we already have very solid plans for interface and no time to deviate from that plan. The peer interface is widget-based but is more generic so that the same interface elements can be rendered directly to the screen on Linux environments, or via browser using flash. We've already done a lot of code for this, but we need [[peerd]] in place for any of this to be testable. | ||
− | :Sorry, i posted all of [[Special:Contributions&target=Phalseid|this]] before I read your message [[Dashboard|here]]. How close are you to being able to show this? I would still like a demo i could show, so if anyone has [[ | + | |
+ | We already have an interface methodology underway which is widget-based and can optionally work in a browser via Flash. The interface is based on the fundamentals of the project and so working on a different interface solution is not a useful sidetrack for me. I'm happy to develolp new features, but only when they're in line with the projects direction. [[User:Nad|Nad]] 09:55, 9 Feb 2006 (NZDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Sorry, i posted all of [[Special:Contributions&target=Phalseid|this]] before I read your message [[Dashboard|here]]. How close are you to being able to show this? I would still like a demo i could show, so if anyone has [[i want a working widget|time....]] |
Latest revision as of 22:34, 24 December 2006
A good idea, but not for this context - we already have very solid plans for interface and no time to deviate from that plan. The peer interface is widget-based but is more generic so that the same interface elements can be rendered directly to the screen on Linux environments, or via browser using flash. We've already done a lot of code for this, but we need peerd in place for any of this to be testable.
We already have an interface methodology underway which is widget-based and can optionally work in a browser via Flash. The interface is based on the fundamentals of the project and so working on a different interface solution is not a useful sidetrack for me. I'm happy to develolp new features, but only when they're in line with the projects direction. Nad 09:55, 9 Feb 2006 (NZDT)