Difference between revisions of "Economic bottom line"
({{Bottom line}}) |
m (→See also) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[Evolution]] | *[[Evolution]] | ||
− | *[[ | + | *[[Unification]] |
*[[Governance]] | *[[Governance]] | ||
*[[Survival of the fittest]] | *[[Survival of the fittest]] | ||
*[[w:Triple bottom line|Triple bottom line]] | *[[w:Triple bottom line|Triple bottom line]] | ||
[[Category:Philosophy]] | [[Category:Philosophy]] |
Revision as of 01:23, 3 July 2011
Organisations (and organisms) evolve in response to changes in their environment such changes in supply or demand of resources and materials and changes knowledge, but an important factor determining the nature of change that takes place in an organisation depends on how it assesses the benefit of options available to it in terms of changes to its behaviours it could choose to accept or reject.
The bottom line
Organisations (and organisms) evolve in response to changes in their environment, such as changes in supply or demand of resources and materials and changes in knowledge, but an important factor determining the nature of change that takes place in an organisation depends on how it assesses the benefit of options available to it in terms of changes to its behaviours that it could choose to accept or reject.
This "measuring stick" that determines what's beneficial and what isn't, and how beneficial or damaging something is, often gets referred to as the bottom line, and is the ultimate determinant of which concepts survive. The most common bottom line we see in our civilisation today is the economic bottom line, which means that most decision-making processes are benefiting the planet only indirectly, if at all. The Organic Design system is instead based on the bottom line of harmony.