Difference between revisions of "Bottom line"
(→See also: Foundation Ontology) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[Unification]] | *[[Unification]] | ||
| + | *[[Foundation Ontology]] | ||
*[[Economic bottom line]] | *[[Economic bottom line]] | ||
*[[Survival of the fittest]] | *[[Survival of the fittest]] | ||
Revision as of 01:40, 16 July 2011
|
Organisations (and organisms) evolve in response to changes in their environment such changes in supply or demand of resources and materials and changes knowledge, but an important factor determining the nature of change that takes place in an organisation depends on how it assesses the benefit of options available to it in terms of changes to its behaviours it could choose to accept or reject.
This "measuring stick" that determines what's beneficial and what isn't, and how beneficial or damaging something is often gets referred to as "the bottom line", and is the ultimate cause of which concepts survive. The most common bottom-line we see in our civilisation today is the economic bottom line which means that most decision-making processes are benefiting the planet only indirectly if at all. The OrganicDesign system is instead based on the bottom line of Unification.
|
Unification is one of the values of OrganicDesign (the Platform specification includes a process of alignment with it). It is the foundation direction of all Platforms (trust groups that operate according to a system that is aligned with the OrganicDesign charter). It is the fundamental "default project" that essentially sums up the process of alignment itself, and could be thought of as "alignment with alignment".
[more]
