Difference between revisions of "Talk:ETVX"

From Organic Design wiki
(we kinda talked about this earlier....do you remember where? (*i think i got chills or something*))
(eular)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way.
 
All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way.
 
:How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"?
 
:How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"?
::it's not to good yet...i need some help there.  
+
::it's not to good yet...i need some help there.
 +
:::So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of ''<h1>e<sup>i&pi;</sup></h1>''
 
::i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--[[User:Phalseid|Phalseid]] 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST)
 
::i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--[[User:Phalseid|Phalseid]] 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST)

Revision as of 04:32, 28 September 2006

All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way.

How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"?
it's not to good yet...i need some help there.
So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of

e

i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--Phalseid 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST)