Difference between revisions of "C-Roundabout"

From Organic Design wiki
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Many cyclists find big roundabouts daunting to ride around, and can also suffer much higher crash rates than at traffic signals.  Although multi-lane roundabouts are not necessarily death-traps for cyclists, they can be at the very least a deterrent to novice riders.  Governments are trying to encourage more people take up cycling after all, for both health and congestion reasons.
 
Many cyclists find big roundabouts daunting to ride around, and can also suffer much higher crash rates than at traffic signals.  Although multi-lane roundabouts are not necessarily death-traps for cyclists, they can be at the very least a deterrent to novice riders.  Governments are trying to encourage more people take up cycling after all, for both health and congestion reasons.
  
Roundabouts are a much safer form of intersection control than traffic signals and will suffer far fewer injury crashes.  This is simply because much higher collision speeds are possible at traffic signals compared to a ''well designed'' roundabout.  However, you may get as many or more minor vehicle damage only crashes at roundabouts.   
+
Roundabouts are a much safer form of intersection control than traffic signals and will suffer far fewer injury crashes.  This is simply because much higher collision speeds are possible at traffic signals compared to a ''well designed'' roundabout.  However, many city councils in New Zealand are more concerned with catering for pedestrians and cyclists and are instead installing traffic signals which is contrary to the objective of reducing injury crashes on our roadsOther reasons may include: conventional multi-lane roundabouts can take up a lot of room so can be expensive to install; roundabouts are generally trickier things to design well; and traffic behaviour can be less predictable than at traffic signals.  This is where the C-Roundabout fits in quite well - it can be built in a compact area and if designed with lower vehicle speeds in mind can be safer for both pedestrians as well as cyclists.  This is achievable because it requires larger vehicles such as truck or buses to straddle traffic lanes, and car drivers have to discern that they are to keep clear of these vehicles.     
 
 
However, some city councils in New Zealand are more concerned with catering for pedestrians and cyclists and are instead installing traffic signals which is contrary to the objective of reducing injury crashes on New Zealand RoadsConventional multi-lane roundabouts can take up a lot of room so can be expensive to install, are trickier things to design, and traffic behaviour can be less predictable than signals.  This is where the C-Roundabout fits in quite well - it can be built in a compact area and if designed with lower vehicle speeds in mind can be safer for both pedestrians as well as cyclists.  This is achievable because it requires larger vehicles such as truck or buses to straddle traffic lanes, and car drivers have to discern that they are to keep clear of these vehicles.     
 
  
 
Several C-Roundabouts have been successfully built in Waitakere City since 2007.  A NZTA research project that reviews their operation is currently being submitted for publication and hopefully should be available early 2011. [http://cyclingconf.org.nz/system/files/NZCyclingConf09_5A_CampbellJurisichAsmus_Roundabts.pdf], [http://cyclingconf.org.nz/system/files/05a4-Duncan-Campbell.pdf].  This review included collecting feedback from drivers, cyclists and pedestrians.  In general a high proportion of drivers do not like them because they squeeze you closer to vehicles in adjacent lanes.  However cyclists and pedestrians certainly prefer the C-Roundabout because traffic speeds are lower and cyclists are better able to 'claim the lane'.
 
Several C-Roundabouts have been successfully built in Waitakere City since 2007.  A NZTA research project that reviews their operation is currently being submitted for publication and hopefully should be available early 2011. [http://cyclingconf.org.nz/system/files/NZCyclingConf09_5A_CampbellJurisichAsmus_Roundabts.pdf], [http://cyclingconf.org.nz/system/files/05a4-Duncan-Campbell.pdf].  This review included collecting feedback from drivers, cyclists and pedestrians.  In general a high proportion of drivers do not like them because they squeeze you closer to vehicles in adjacent lanes.  However cyclists and pedestrians certainly prefer the C-Roundabout because traffic speeds are lower and cyclists are better able to 'claim the lane'.
  
 
Note this page is at the moment in its very draft stages so my apologies.  I hope to clean it up a bit and add more references, and put some links to video footage which I will try to make available. [[User:The Duncan|The Duncan]] 06:54, 10 September 2010 (NZST)
 
Note this page is at the moment in its very draft stages so my apologies.  I hope to clean it up a bit and add more references, and put some links to video footage which I will try to make available. [[User:The Duncan|The Duncan]] 06:54, 10 September 2010 (NZST)

Revision as of 05:39, 15 September 2010

Author: Duncan Campbell The Duncan

The C-Roundabout is a new type of multi-lane roundabout developed in New Zealand in 2005, originally for the sole purpose of catering for cyclists. It was developed as part of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) research programme [1] [2], and was concurrently the topic for a thesis submitted for partial completion of a Masters degree (civil engineering) by Duncan Campbell.

Many cyclists find big roundabouts daunting to ride around, and can also suffer much higher crash rates than at traffic signals. Although multi-lane roundabouts are not necessarily death-traps for cyclists, they can be at the very least a deterrent to novice riders. Governments are trying to encourage more people take up cycling after all, for both health and congestion reasons.

Roundabouts are a much safer form of intersection control than traffic signals and will suffer far fewer injury crashes. This is simply because much higher collision speeds are possible at traffic signals compared to a well designed roundabout. However, many city councils in New Zealand are more concerned with catering for pedestrians and cyclists and are instead installing traffic signals which is contrary to the objective of reducing injury crashes on our roads. Other reasons may include: conventional multi-lane roundabouts can take up a lot of room so can be expensive to install; roundabouts are generally trickier things to design well; and traffic behaviour can be less predictable than at traffic signals. This is where the C-Roundabout fits in quite well - it can be built in a compact area and if designed with lower vehicle speeds in mind can be safer for both pedestrians as well as cyclists. This is achievable because it requires larger vehicles such as truck or buses to straddle traffic lanes, and car drivers have to discern that they are to keep clear of these vehicles.

Several C-Roundabouts have been successfully built in Waitakere City since 2007. A NZTA research project that reviews their operation is currently being submitted for publication and hopefully should be available early 2011. [3], [4]. This review included collecting feedback from drivers, cyclists and pedestrians. In general a high proportion of drivers do not like them because they squeeze you closer to vehicles in adjacent lanes. However cyclists and pedestrians certainly prefer the C-Roundabout because traffic speeds are lower and cyclists are better able to 'claim the lane'.

Note this page is at the moment in its very draft stages so my apologies. I hope to clean it up a bit and add more references, and put some links to video footage which I will try to make available. The Duncan 06:54, 10 September 2010 (NZST)