Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dashboard"
(moved to talk page) |
(moved nads comments here so when i wake up and forget, i find them easily.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
A good idea, but not for this context - we already have very solid plans for interface and no time to deviate from that plan. The peer interface is widget-based but is more generic so that the same interface elements can be rendered directly to the screen on Linux environments, or via browser using flash. We've already done a lot of code for this, but we need [[peerd]] in place for any of this to be testable. | A good idea, but not for this context - we already have very solid plans for interface and no time to deviate from that plan. The peer interface is widget-based but is more generic so that the same interface elements can be rendered directly to the screen on Linux environments, or via browser using flash. We've already done a lot of code for this, but we need [[peerd]] in place for any of this to be testable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We already have an interface methodology underway which is widget-based and can optionally work in a browser via Flash. The interface is based on the fundamentals of the project and so working on a different interface solution is not a useful sidetrack for me. I'm happy to develolp new features, but only when they're in line with the projects direction. [[User:Nad|Nad]] 09:55, 9 Feb 2006 (NZDT) | ||
| + | |||
:Sorry, i posted all of [[Special:Contributions&target=Phalseid|this]] before I read your message [[Dashboard|here]]. How close are you to being able to show this? I would still like a demo i could show, so if anyone has [[i_want_a_working_widget|time....]] | :Sorry, i posted all of [[Special:Contributions&target=Phalseid|this]] before I read your message [[Dashboard|here]]. How close are you to being able to show this? I would still like a demo i could show, so if anyone has [[i_want_a_working_widget|time....]] | ||
Revision as of 22:56, 8 February 2006
A good idea, but not for this context - we already have very solid plans for interface and no time to deviate from that plan. The peer interface is widget-based but is more generic so that the same interface elements can be rendered directly to the screen on Linux environments, or via browser using flash. We've already done a lot of code for this, but we need peerd in place for any of this to be testable.
We already have an interface methodology underway which is widget-based and can optionally work in a browser via Flash. The interface is based on the fundamentals of the project and so working on a different interface solution is not a useful sidetrack for me. I'm happy to develolp new features, but only when they're in line with the projects direction. Nad 09:55, 9 Feb 2006 (NZDT)
