Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peerix logo research"
From Organic Design wiki
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think he's way too complicated. Lets try and see what we can take away. It suffers from being based on a geometrically modeled shape, not like a real drawing. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 11:59, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST) | I think he's way too complicated. Lets try and see what we can take away. It suffers from being based on a geometrically modeled shape, not like a real drawing. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 11:59, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST) | ||
:Well you can make another version if you like, but I'm going to keep this one too --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST) | :Well you can make another version if you like, but I'm going to keep this one too --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST) | ||
| + | ::And also, in what context is it considered a problem to be based on a geometric shape? | ||
I don't think those can really be thought of as a series of options - more like an evolution from 1-6 and then the with-toolbox is a variation using whatever then current penguen is... --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST) | I don't think those can really be thought of as a series of options - more like an evolution from 1-6 and then the with-toolbox is a variation using whatever then current penguen is... --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST) | ||
Revision as of 00:26, 16 April 2006
I think he's way too complicated. Lets try and see what we can take away. It suffers from being based on a geometrically modeled shape, not like a real drawing. --Rob 11:59, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
- Well you can make another version if you like, but I'm going to keep this one too --Nad 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
- And also, in what context is it considered a problem to be based on a geometric shape?
I don't think those can really be thought of as a series of options - more like an evolution from 1-6 and then the with-toolbox is a variation using whatever then current penguen is... --Nad 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
