Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peerix logo research"

From Organic Design wiki
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think he's way too complicated. Lets try and see what we can take away. It suffers from being based on a geometrically modeled shape, not like a real drawing. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 11:59, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
 
I think he's way too complicated. Lets try and see what we can take away. It suffers from being based on a geometrically modeled shape, not like a real drawing. --[[User:Rob|Rob]] 11:59, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
:Well you can make another version if you like, but I'm going to keep this one too --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
+
:The whole thing about creative stuff like names, logo's, icons and avatars is that there can be any options and to choose from. --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 13:07, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
::And also, in what context is it considered a problem to be based on a geometric shape?
 
  
 
I don't think those can really be thought of as a series of options - more like an evolution from 1-6 and then the with-toolbox is a variation using whatever then current penguen is... --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)
 
I don't think those can really be thought of as a series of options - more like an evolution from 1-6 and then the with-toolbox is a variation using whatever then current penguen is... --[[User:Nad|Nad]] 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)

Revision as of 01:07, 16 April 2006

I think he's way too complicated. Lets try and see what we can take away. It suffers from being based on a geometrically modeled shape, not like a real drawing. --Rob 11:59, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)

The whole thing about creative stuff like names, logo's, icons and avatars is that there can be any options and to choose from. --Nad 13:07, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)

I don't think those can really be thought of as a series of options - more like an evolution from 1-6 and then the with-toolbox is a variation using whatever then current penguen is... --Nad 12:01, 16 Apr 2006 (NZST)