Difference between revisions of "Talk:ETVX"
From Organic Design wiki
(we kinda talked about this earlier....do you remember where? (*i think i got chills or something*)) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way. | All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way. | ||
:How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"? | :How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"? | ||
| − | ::it's not to good yet...i need some help there. | + | ::it's not to good yet...i need some help there. |
| + | ::i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--[[User:Phalseid|Phalseid]] 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST) | ||
Revision as of 04:24, 28 September 2006
All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way.
- How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"?
- it's not to good yet...i need some help there.
- i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--Phalseid 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST)
