Difference between revisions of "Talk:ETVX"
From Organic Design wiki
(great quote for the project. now im really going to bed...) |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::it's not to good yet...i need some help there. | ::it's not to good yet...i need some help there. | ||
:::So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of ''<h1>e<sup>iπ</sup></h1>'' | :::So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of ''<h1>e<sup>iπ</sup></h1>'' | ||
+ | [[+Euler]] | ||
+ | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
− | Benjamin Peirce (1809-1880, American mathematician, professor at Harvard) gave a lecture proving "Euler's identity", and concluded: | + | |
+ | Benjamin Peirce (1809-1880, American mathematician, professor at Harvard) | ||
+ | gave a lecture proving "Euler's identity", and concluded: | ||
"Gentlemen, that is surely true, | "Gentlemen, that is surely true, |
Revision as of 12:42, 29 September 2006
All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way.
- How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"?
- it's not to good yet...i need some help there.
- So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of
eiπ
- So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of
- it's not to good yet...i need some help there.
Benjamin Peirce (1809-1880, American mathematician, professor at Harvard) gave a lecture proving "Euler's identity", and concluded: "Gentlemen, that is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means. But we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth."
- i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--Phalseid 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST)