Talk:ETVX

From Organic Design wiki
Revision as of 06:15, 5 October 2006 by Nad (talk | contribs) (we've got some other phi/e stuff in e and talk:e too :-))

Okay Guys, you are either going to make my head explode or make me celebrate the fact that I can take all those rocks in my head and create a nice zen-like rock pile.

I won't go into great detail here but I thought this might be a place that should mention that I leverage(abuse) the Fibonnaci sequence for a lot thinking and visual modeling.

we've got some other phi/e stuff in e and talk:e too :-)

Aregularjoe 06:04, 5 Oct 2006 (NZST)

All this stuff is excellent content, existing patterns which are built up this ETVX way will be very easy to move across into the nodal model in a rules-based way.

How formalised is the interaction between the orthogonal "cardinal dimensions"?
it's not to good yet...i need some help there.
So do I! but I know its got a lot to do with the geometric structure of

e

+Euler


Benjamin Peirce (1809-1880, American mathematician, professor at Harvard)
gave a lecture proving "Euler's identity", and concluded:

"Gentlemen, that is surely true,
it is absolutely paradoxical;
we cannot understand it,
and we don't know what it means.
But we have proved it,
and therefore we know it must be the truth."
i also like you tiein to OODA. There are many similar models in business, I have found over and over again the "3" linking into a 4th "transdimensional" union...--Phalseid 22:24, 27 Sep 2006 (NZST)