Difference between revisions of "Group decision-making"

From Organic Design wiki
(update)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<noinclude>{{glossary}}</noinclude>Group decision making is an essential of the [[alignment]] process in [[trust group]]s, and is defined as one of the essential aspects of a [[platform]]. The [[platform specification]] requires that [[member]]s of the group have available a simple interface allowing questions or choices to be collaborated upon by the members.
 
<noinclude>{{glossary}}</noinclude>Group decision making is an essential of the [[alignment]] process in [[trust group]]s, and is defined as one of the essential aspects of a [[platform]]. The [[platform specification]] requires that [[member]]s of the group have available a simple interface allowing questions or choices to be collaborated upon by the members.
 
<noinclude>
 
<noinclude>
For large groups and organisations making decisions that affect many [[stakeholder]]s or people's [[right]]s, more advanced forms of group decision involving feedback is required such as the [[TIPAESA]] methodology, but for smaller decisions with little impact simple tools like [http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaAbout?pt=About+IdeaStorm Idea Storm] are a very useful and productive component to have available.
+
For most decisions, simple tools like [http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaAbout?pt=About+IdeaStorm Idea Storm] are a very useful and productive component for groups and projects to have available, but for larger-scale decisions that affect many [[stakeholder]]s or even people's [[right]]s a more complete system of [[self governance]] is required.
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 03:10, 26 June 2011

Glossary.svg This page describes a concept which is part of our glossary

Group decision making is an essential of the alignment process in trust groups, and is defined as one of the essential aspects of a platform. The platform specification requires that members of the group have available a simple interface allowing questions or choices to be collaborated upon by the members.

For most decisions, simple tools like Idea Storm are a very useful and productive component for groups and projects to have available, but for larger-scale decisions that affect many stakeholders or even people's rights a more complete system of self governance is required.

See also