Difference between revisions of "Organic Design peer group"
(→Key defining aspects of the peer group: openness) |
m (→Key defining aspects of the peer group) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[[Director|Directed]] by [[User:Nad|Aran]] | *[[Director|Directed]] by [[User:Nad|Aran]] | ||
*[[Manager|Managed]] by [[User:Milan|Milan]] | *[[Manager|Managed]] by [[User:Milan|Milan]] | ||
− | *It [[alignment|align]]s itself with the [[OrganicDesign charter]] and the [[Manifesto|OrganicDesign manifesto]] to help attain the [[OrganicDesign vision]]. | + | *It [[alignment|align]]s itself with [[OrganicDesign]] (it aligned to the [[OrganicDesign charter]] and the [[Manifesto|OrganicDesign manifesto]] to help attain the [[OrganicDesign vision]]). |
*It's primarily concerned with the software architecture aspect to the [[OrganicDesign vision]]. | *It's primarily concerned with the software architecture aspect to the [[OrganicDesign vision]]. | ||
*The peer group are dedicated to openness and are attempting to make all aspects of their operation open and public, not just the resulting software and documentation. | *The peer group are dedicated to openness and are attempting to make all aspects of their operation open and public, not just the resulting software and documentation. |
Revision as of 10:05, 23 June 2011
One such question is, if you were performing a particular task, would you like to know if anyone anywhere else performing the same task had a better way of doing it? Another related question is, would you like to live in a world where all such "best ways" were made openly accessible to and easily understandable by everyone? An overwhelming majority would answer "yes" to the first question. The second though is one that many people would think about more deeply before answering and may answer "no".
The people who share the common vision we talk about here at Organic Design are those that answer "yes" to both of the previous questions. We don't know how many people that is, but judging from the popularity of the free software movement and other similar projects, we can be very sure that even if it's not a global majority it's certainly hundreds of millions of people world-wide!
That's an enormous potential for action, but how does an organic group like this begin to achieve anything together? We believe the answer lies in alignment... [more]Key defining aspects of the peer group
- Directed by Aran
- Managed by Milan
- It aligns itself with OrganicDesign (it aligned to the OrganicDesign charter and the OrganicDesign manifesto to help attain the OrganicDesign vision).
- It's primarily concerned with the software architecture aspect to the OrganicDesign vision.
- The peer group are dedicated to openness and are attempting to make all aspects of their operation open and public, not just the resulting software and documentation.
- It's members are system architects and developers, and as such are dedicated to "eating their own dogfood" by using the system for as many aspects of the group's operation as they can. Currently this means using Wiki Organisation, this may soon become Drupal-base, and ultimately our own Squeak-based system.
- The members are committed to spending a lot of time in conceptual and research-oriented group sessions and for this reason have a lower ability to take on hands-on work such as programming or IT-support.
- Most of the members are dedicated to exclusively using Libre software where ever possible.