Difference between revisions of "Group decision-making"

From Organic Design wiki
(update)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{glossary}}
+
<noinclude>{{glossary}}</noinclude>Group decision making is an essential of the [[alignment]] process in [[trust group]]s, and is defined as one of the essential aspects of a [[platform]]. The [[platform specification]] requires that [[member]]s of the group have available a simple interface allowing questions or choices to be collaborated upon by the members.
Group decision making is an essential part of the [[platform specification]] which is to offer a simple interface allowing questions or choices to be collaborated on by members of a group, and then the members able to offer their opinion. For large groups to making decisions or for decisions involving the public, more advanced forms of group decision involving feedback and weighting is required, but for small [[trust group]]s even the simplest [http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaAbout?pt=About+IdeaStorm idea storm]-like interface is a very useful and productive component.
+
<noinclude>
 +
For large groups and organisations making decisions that affect many [[stakeholder]]s or people's [[right]]s, more advanced forms of group decision involving feedback is required such as the [[TIPAESA]] methodology, but for smaller decisions with little impact simple tools like [http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaAbout?pt=About+IdeaStorm Idea Storm] are a very useful and productive component to have available.
 +
 
 +
== See also ==
 +
*[[Trust group]]
 +
*[[Self governance]]
 +
*[[Conflict resolution]]
 +
*[http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaAbout?pt=About+IdeaStorm Idea Storm]
 +
</noinclude>

Revision as of 02:51, 26 June 2011

Glossary.svg This page describes a concept which is part of our glossary

Group decision making is an essential of the alignment process in trust groups, and is defined as one of the essential aspects of a platform. The platform specification requires that members of the group have available a simple interface allowing questions or choices to be collaborated upon by the members.

For large groups and organisations making decisions that affect many stakeholders or people's rights, more advanced forms of group decision involving feedback is required such as the TIPAESA methodology, but for smaller decisions with little impact simple tools like Idea Storm are a very useful and productive component to have available.

See also