Difference between revisions of "Platform specification"

From Organic Design wiki
(Platform architecture: bit more structrue)
m
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The [[platform specification]] document is a [[specification]] for [[OrganicDesign]] (which is a [[trust group]]) so that it's [[member]]s may engage in an ongoing process of [[alignment]] with its [[OrganicDesign vision|vision]] and core documents. The overall result of aligning with this specification is for the organisation or group to form into a [[platform]], and for all the platforms to form into a global [[platform network]] allowing our civilisation to [[self governance|self govern]] as a single organism achieving its [[shared vision]] in a sustainable manner which looks after the well-being of itself and all its members.<noinclude>
+
The [[platform specification]] document is a [[specification]] for [[OrganicDesign]] (which is a [[trust group]]) so that it's [[member]]s may engage in an ongoing process of [[alignment]] with its [[OrganicDesign vision|vision]] and core documents. The overall result of aligning with this specification is for the organisation or group to form into a [[platform]], and for all the platforms to form into a global [[platform network]] allowing our civilisation to [[self governance|self govern]] as a single organism achieving its [[shared vision]] in a sustainable manner which looks after the well-being of itself, its environment and all its members.<noinclude>
 
{{section zero|OrganicDesign}}
 
{{section zero|OrganicDesign}}
 
{{section zero|Platform}}
 
{{section zero|Platform}}
Line 17: Line 17:
 
Getting more specific and viewing the software architecture from a perspective of milestones and tasks and effort involved, the [[platform roadmap]] then outlines a sequence and methodology for our ideas around implementation. This focuses on core technologies to create a functional platform in alignment with our design principles. There are a number of related projects which can then further expand on this foundation and provide further functionality or value-added services. Such projects can be negotiated between the peer group and interested parties on a case by case basis, including financial arrangements.
 
Getting more specific and viewing the software architecture from a perspective of milestones and tasks and effort involved, the [[platform roadmap]] then outlines a sequence and methodology for our ideas around implementation. This focuses on core technologies to create a functional platform in alignment with our design principles. There are a number of related projects which can then further expand on this foundation and provide further functionality or value-added services. Such projects can be negotiated between the peer group and interested parties on a case by case basis, including financial arrangements.
  
== The specification ==
+
=== MVP ===
As stated above, the specification must be complete and technology independent so that any variety of technological environments can have documents written to support the common specification. For example our [[software architecture]] document describes implementing the Platform specification in the context of our own Linux web-desktop operating system.
+
{{quote|A minimum viable product (MVP) helps entrepreneurs start the process of learning as quickly as possible. It is not necessarily the smallest product imaginable, though; it is simply the fastest way to start learning how to build a sustainable business with the minimum amount of effort.
  
This technology independent approach also means that a group of people could begin working as a platform without the use of computers and this specification would describe completely everything they need to do to work in [[alignment]] with all other platforms and for a [[platform network]] together that moves toward an aligned global vision as a single holistic organism.
+
Contrary to traditional product development, which usually involves a long, thoughtful incubation period and strives for product perfection, the goal of the MVP is to begin the process of learning, not end it. Unlike a prototype or concept test, an MVP is designed not just to answer product design or technical questions. Its goal is to test fundamental business hypotheses.
  
A technology independent description can still refer to things like documents, forms, records, requests, reports, events and messages without needing to refer to any concept about IT, computer hardware, operating systems or software packages.
+
The lesson of the MVP is that any additional work beyond what was required to start learning is waste, no matter how important it might have seemed at the time.|http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/19/dropbox-minimal-viable-product/}}
  
The specification is divided into two sections, one for the architectural perspective which covers the functional aspects of a platform, and one describing the platform from the user's perspective.
+
== Technology independent description ==
 +
As stated above, the specification must be complete and technology independent so that any variety of technological environments can have documents written to support the common specification.
  
=== Platform use ===
+
For example our [[software architecture]] document describes implementing the Platform specification in the context of our own Linux web-desktop operating system [[package]]d with all the software applications and documented [[procedure]]s necessary to fully support users to operate together as a Platform. Using a technology independent approach to the specification makes it possible to replace any part of the package with alternative solutions and update the configuration and procedures to allow this replacement to be a new option for people to select from. Such options may include variations of operating system its running within, different project management applications and different selections of documentation aimed at specific industries.
In describing how platform is used, we are in essence describing a method for systematic organisation on a personal, group and societal level. The fundamental assumption we make is that individuals or groups are striving toward the achievement of goals and visions and are using a systematic approach to achieve them. We will attempt to describe clearly the activities and procedures individuals or groups engage in when working toward goals using a system, as well as what is needed to coordinate the activities of multiple groups forming societies or institutions.
 
  
Even though we will describe these things in a technology-neutral way, these usage scenarios can form the basis of [http://www.bridging-the-gap.com/moving-from-an-epic-to-a-user-story-in-an-agile-product-backlog/ "epics" and "stories"] that are used in agile software development. This will aid our efforts to develop software that is compliant with the platform specification. software-specific considerations such as interface layouts and networking technology is described in our [[software architecture]] article.
+
This technology independent approach also means that a group of people could begin working as a platform without the use of computers and this specification would describe completely everything they need to do to work in [[alignment]] with all other platforms and for a [[platform network]] together that moves toward an aligned global vision as a single holistic organism.
  
==== Platform use for self organisation ====
+
A technology independent description can still refer to things like documents, forms, records, requests, reports, events and messages without needing to refer to any concept about IT, computer hardware, operating systems or software packages.
Our entry point to using a platform is naturally the perspective of the individual user and the activities people engage in to get work done, be it for private or business affairs. We refer to the systematic approach for pursuing these activities as "[[self organisation]]". Other terms commonly used for this process are personal organisation or self-management: {{quote|In [[W:business|business]], [[W:education|education]], and [[W:psychology|psychology]], self-management refers to methods, skills, and strategies by which individuals can effectively direct their own activities toward the achievement of [[W:Objective (goal)|objective]]s, and includes [[W:goal setting|goal setting]], [[W:decision making|decision making]], [[W:focusing|focusing]], [[W:planning|planning]], [[W:scheduling|scheduling]], task tracking, self-[[W:evaluation|evaluation]], self-intervention, [[W:personal development|self-development]], etc.  Also known as ''executive processes'' (in the context of the ''processes of execution'').|Wikipedia, [[W:Self-management|Self-management]]}}In software terms, applications that support these activities go under the umbrella term "[[W:Personal information manager|PIM tool]]" - '''P'''ersonal '''I'''nformation '''M'''anagement tool.
 
 
 
There are two main entry points to self organisation: Bottom-up and top-down. The difference is which area they focus on, whereby top-down methods focus on defining high level goals,visions and principles and use those as a starting point to allow people to organise themselves. A popular example of this approach is Stephen Covey's "[[W:The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People|The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People]]". Bottom-up self organisation in contrast focuses on helping people organise the "stuff" in their lives: the projects they are involved with in private and professional life, tasks, appointments, in-boxes, filing systems, etc. Only after these things have been organised into a coherent structure is the work on high level goals and values introduced. One of the leading thinkers in this area is David Allen, who pioneered the "[[W:Getting Things Done|Getting Things Done]]" system for personal organisation.
 
 
 
The platform will support both approaches, while incorporating all of the concepts generally used in personal organisation.
 
 
 
*Setup
 
*Direction and administration
 
*Communications
 
*Finance
 
 
 
==== Group platform ====
 
Activities and processes for group activities
 
*Setup - group formation and membership
 
 
 
===== Governance =====
 
*Group decision making
 
*TIPAESA
 
*Direction and administration
 
*Communications
 
*Finance
 
 
 
===== Setup & deployment =====
 
*Organisation
 
*Member
 
 
 
===== Roles & responsibilities =====
 
 
 
===== Procedures & practices =====
 
 
 
===== Documentation =====
 
 
 
===== Scheduling =====
 
*Notifications
 
*Shared
 
*Resource booking
 
*System (roles, people, processors)
 
 
 
===== Forms & records =====
 
*Reports
 
  
===== Trading =====
+
The specification is divided into two sections, one for the [[Platform specification/architecture|architectural perspective]] which covers the functional aspects of a platform, and one describing the platform from the [[Platform specification/use cases|member's perspective]].
*Payment methods
 
*products and services
 
*subscriptions
 
*invoices
 
  
==== Platform Network ====
+
== Current technologies ==
 +
=== Singly ===
 +
*http://singly.com/
  
=== Platform architecture ===
+
This sounds pretty similar to the Platform, for example the clean and unified interface sitting on top of multiple data sources. This is backed by some key open source people and they have got the right idea:
This is the architecture of the [[system]] that platform [[member]]s work within. The [[trust group]] is the concept which forms the foundation of what a platform actually is.
 
{{section zero|trust group}}
 
But more specifically, the group doesn't have just [[member]]s, but also is a collection of [[resource]]s such as documents, [[procedure]]s and tools all working together [[alignment|in accord]] with a [[system]] to become an [[organisation]], the details of which are defined in this specification.
 
  
==== Portals & structure ====
+
{{quote|You make data. A lot of it. From Web browsing to link sharing to photos published online, from phone bills to medical records to online banking - almost all of us produce an incredible amount of electronic data that slips right through our fingers - often into the gaping maw of a corporate world without our best interests in mind. What if you could easily capture all that data yourself, though? What if you could use it like fuel for apps built for you to view, sort and take action based on all that data?|http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/singly_platform_launch.php}}
Each of the items mentioned above have a [[portal]] for the members to organise and govern these resource together, usually with the aim of achieving a [[shared vision]]. The portal acts as an entry point for the members to collaborate together on knowledge and tools so that they can engage in [[group decision-making]] and [[self governance]] together. Since the groups can be further divided within into a hierarchy of trust-groups, it follows that all the groups forming this internal structure should work the same way and therefore also act as portals of organisation and governance.
 
  
==== Alignment to values ====
+
Now if only the "apps" were thought of as emergent organic groups based on preferences and usage patterns...
We must ensure in our [[system]] design the [[alignment]] with our [[values]] so that all Platforms based on it always [[evolution|evolve]] toward a more and more aligned [[direction]] over time. Alignment is not just statements made that "we promise to care about this and that", alignment to something is a [[process]], it needs to actually exist as part of the system so that work is performed on a regular basis that ensures that the [[direction]] of the organisation really is maintaining alignment consistently throughout time with what it says it is. To really achieve this we must look carefully at the mechanism we're creating with our system description to see what its [[bottom line]]s really are; whether it will still be maintaining alignment to these values some time after it's been set free into the [[economic bottom line]] environment which is hostile to it. So we define here a structure which is primarily aimed at supporting this alignment, the top-level categorisation of our system is into [[department]]s.
 
  
==== Platform departments ====
+
== Subpages making up the specification ==
We're initially basing the departments on Thomas Robertson's "seven great mechanisms" described in his 1948 book [[Human Ecology]]. This is not to say that these departments need to be fixed to number seven, or that they should be the same names or same amount of them at different [[scale]]s of operation. These details can [[evolution|evolve]] through [[self governance]] just as [[all aspects changeable|all aspects can change]]. But the two key ideas here are:
+
{{#dpl:titlematch=Platform specification/%|notnamespace=Talk}}
*We start with departments that we know can cater for the needs of the global scale of operation
 
*We ensure that the principles of their operation remain consistent across all scales even if their names change or they [[split]] into more or [[merge]] into less of them in different scales of operation or specificity.
 
{{section zero|Direction department}}
 
{{section zero|Management department}}
 
{{section zero|Networking department}}
 
{{section zero|Administration department}}
 
{{section zero|Alignment department}}
 
{{section zero|Production department}}
 
{{section zero|Trading department}}
 
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Line 109: Line 53:
 
*[[OrganicDesign]]
 
*[[OrganicDesign]]
 
*[[Spontaneous Evolution]]
 
*[[Spontaneous Evolution]]
[[Category:Documents]]
+
[[Category:Documents]][[Category:Platform]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 18:36, 16 April 2014

The platform specification document is a specification for OrganicDesign (which is a trust group) so that it's members may engage in an ongoing process of alignment with its vision and core documents. The overall result of aligning with this specification is for the organisation or group to form into a platform, and for all the platforms to form into a global platform network allowing our civilisation to self govern as a single organism achieving its shared vision in a sustainable manner which looks after the well-being of itself, its environment and all its members.

OrganicDesign: OrganicDesign [more]
Platform: In the Organic Design context, platform refers to an organisation that is using the platform specification as the foundation of it's system design, so that it operates in accord with the values outlined in our charter and manifesto. Part of the platform specification is that all platforms have some common departments such as networking and deployment which allows them to share knowledge and create new Platforms through common interest and shared vision. The platform network refers to the collection of all the platforms connected together to form a global peer-to-peer network that achieve their goals together in alignment with each other and the common good using self governance. [more]
Platform network: The Platform network is the name given to the total of all Platform organisations as a whole. The Platform specification defines how to operate as a "Platform" (a node in the Platform network). [more]
Self governance: When a trust group collaborate on their shared vision and work together to actualise it in alignment with their defined values, they need to have methods and tools available for making decisions together, resolving conflicts and managing resources in their system. Self governance is the ability for a trust group to do these things without requiring any external parties, and in general, is how a group's system can undergo change in response to feedback from its members and stakeholders and from changes in the environment it operates within. The manifesto to which Organic Design is aligned follows the bottom-up principle that organisation at the global scale is achieved by organisation beginning with individuals and local regions, rather than being determined from larger centralised institutions downwards. From this global context, self-governance in alignment with the values allows the best known options to be found and selected for all aspects of the social mechanism. This is achieved by making more effective, unhindered use of the totality of available knowledge and expertise. [more]

The platform specification serves as a high-level technology-independent organisational system description. It's intended that it be a complete description of what it means to be a platform, and as such is the general document that is used as a starting point for more specific documents such as the software architecture which covers use-cases, technology decisions for how software can be developed to be support a platform. All system related concepts such as procedures and best practices are also directed by this specification.

Each trust group may have its own more specific and refined specification, but this document is the specification that OrganicDesign aligns to and serves as a default to help other organisations and groups better align to the common global vision of the planet operating as a single organism as described admirably in Bruce Lipton's book Spontaneous Evolution. These common global ideals are discussed in more detail in the OrganicDesign charter, manifesto, values and OrganicDesign vision.

Methodology

In developing the platform specification we will be observing and documenting common organisational activities and processes at different scales of operation from personal, to group, to organisation and beyond. While we do this we will create a description of a system architecture and interface (including screen mock-ups) that can support those activities.

Using this specification, we will continue to develop a functional prototype system for running platforms, which we will use to work together as a team at Organic Design. Currently we are evaluating the Drupal content management system using the open atrium and storm modules to replicate what we are describing here.

In the software architecture article we are describing the qualities required by the ideal implementation of platform specification, including software language used and an overview of functional requirements. The software architecture article answers the question of how we intend to implement the specification when we have access to the resources to build a system from scratch.

Getting more specific and viewing the software architecture from a perspective of milestones and tasks and effort involved, the platform roadmap then outlines a sequence and methodology for our ideas around implementation. This focuses on core technologies to create a functional platform in alignment with our design principles. There are a number of related projects which can then further expand on this foundation and provide further functionality or value-added services. Such projects can be negotiated between the peer group and interested parties on a case by case basis, including financial arrangements.

MVP

Quote.pngA minimum viable product (MVP) helps entrepreneurs start the process of learning as quickly as possible. It is not necessarily the smallest product imaginable, though; it is simply the fastest way to start learning how to build a sustainable business with the minimum amount of effort.

Contrary to traditional product development, which usually involves a long, thoughtful incubation period and strives for product perfection, the goal of the MVP is to begin the process of learning, not end it. Unlike a prototype or concept test, an MVP is designed not just to answer product design or technical questions. Its goal is to test fundamental business hypotheses.

The lesson of the MVP is that any additional work beyond what was required to start learning is waste, no matter how important it might have seemed at the time.
http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/19/dropbox-minimal-viable-product/

Technology independent description

As stated above, the specification must be complete and technology independent so that any variety of technological environments can have documents written to support the common specification.

For example our software architecture document describes implementing the Platform specification in the context of our own Linux web-desktop operating system packaged with all the software applications and documented procedures necessary to fully support users to operate together as a Platform. Using a technology independent approach to the specification makes it possible to replace any part of the package with alternative solutions and update the configuration and procedures to allow this replacement to be a new option for people to select from. Such options may include variations of operating system its running within, different project management applications and different selections of documentation aimed at specific industries.

This technology independent approach also means that a group of people could begin working as a platform without the use of computers and this specification would describe completely everything they need to do to work in alignment with all other platforms and for a platform network together that moves toward an aligned global vision as a single holistic organism.

A technology independent description can still refer to things like documents, forms, records, requests, reports, events and messages without needing to refer to any concept about IT, computer hardware, operating systems or software packages.

The specification is divided into two sections, one for the architectural perspective which covers the functional aspects of a platform, and one describing the platform from the member's perspective.

Current technologies

Singly

This sounds pretty similar to the Platform, for example the clean and unified interface sitting on top of multiple data sources. This is backed by some key open source people and they have got the right idea:

Quote.pngYou make data. A lot of it. From Web browsing to link sharing to photos published online, from phone bills to medical records to online banking - almost all of us produce an incredible amount of electronic data that slips right through our fingers - often into the gaping maw of a corporate world without our best interests in mind. What if you could easily capture all that data yourself, though? What if you could use it like fuel for apps built for you to view, sort and take action based on all that data?
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/singly_platform_launch.php

Now if only the "apps" were thought of as emergent organic groups based on preferences and usage patterns...

Subpages making up the specification

See also