Difference between revisions of "Frequently asked questions"

From Organic Design wiki
(How can a computer program embody spiritual principles?: initial take)
(thought i already chanegd that - Help cat not FAQ)
Line 66: Line 66:
  
  
[[Category:FAQ]]
+
[[Category:Help]]

Revision as of 02:37, 18 July 2011

How will the ideas in the OrganicDesign website help make the world a better place?

Our content and system covers three main aspects with respect to this question:

First we try and gain an objective understanding of the current global problems by doing dedicated research and identifying common patterns and principles so that solutions we find will be as widely applicable as possible. An important point about such research is that we must look into actual mechanisms and their bottom lines to build up a reliable objective view of the state of affairs, not a view based on opinion.

Second we're working on a specification defining how organisations can work together as a single network in alignment with a set of values which do not suffer from the problems we've identified such as the economic bottom line problem.

Third, our content includes tools that help us move from the current state we found ourselves in now, to a global society operating in this new way. These tools allow our system to be deployed easily by anyone by using a seed mechanism and making the knowledge as accessible as possible.

What is OrgancDesign's main goal?

To build the Platform network which is a global network of organisations that operate together as one in alignment with the core values and manifesto to consistently increase the well-being of all sentient beings. We plan to specify the organisational aspect of this goal in the Platform specification which is a completely technology-independent description, and the Software architecture document aimed at describing a software package that is designed from the ground up to support the requirements of operating a Platform in the network.

How can people get involved?

At the most general level, anyone can be involved simply by being dedicated to the spiritual path and persistently trying to implement it using their own skills, position, connections and resources.

But more specifically, how to get involved in OrganicDesign's implementation of this path involves the following steps:

  • Read the Manifesto, the Charter and Values and see if you feel aligned with them.
  • If so, asked questions create an account
  • Read some of the links in the help to learn about wiki's, MediaWiki and how to use them
  • Start your own user page introducing yourself, your interests and your skills
  • Keep an eye on the recent changes, site news and browse the concepts in the glossary
  • Use your watchlist to stay abreast of changes to articles and discussions of interest
  • Help us improve our content and begin or partake in the discussions about various aspects that are going on in articles talk pages

From this point on the path into more involvement will evolve naturally and eventually lead to a specific role in various OrganicDesign projects.

What spiritual tradition or principles does OrganicDesign follow?

Various members of OrganicDesign have studied Taoism, Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism amongst other traditions. However, categorising the spiritual truth into one tradition or another leads to trouble because every tradition exhibits notable teachers and scriptures making statements which are not in accord with the spritiual truth or are grossly misinterpreted, for example that we are all "born in sin". Instead we have tried in our manifesto to distil a collection of values that are common to all traditions and embody them into the bottom line of all organisations operating in alignment with our specification.

Aren't these matters best left to the experts to solve?

Exactly, that's why it's so important that a new system of governance be put in place which can evolve freely through the enormous repository of expertise that make up society.

The elite currently making the decisions are not necessarily experts in their fields, they've got to the position they're in by doing the bidding of the financial system with its deployment and maintenance of economic bottom line thinking. Real expertise comes from organisation applied to the many, not from the biased opinions of the few.

The solution that We, the people, really need is a governance system that has proper harmonious values as its bottom line, and that isn't going to come from large-scale centralised organisations or institutions. It has to be built and maintained by us, the people, together.

How can our business survive if it doesn't put profit first?

Economist J.K Galbraith noted as far back as the 1950's that short-term profit maximization is a failing strategy for businesses, which instead need to ensure that they adopt long-term survival strategies, which include ensuring that the environment in which they are working is stable before seeking and gaining profit. In this context the approach being taken at this stage is the correct one.

Can this system really scale to large-scale industry and government?

Yes it can. Many of the largest corporations are using exactly the same kinds of systems running on the same open source software. The key is in using simple tools effectively.

What about the workers? Doesn't efficiency threaten jobs?

Efficiency, in the context of science and technology, doesn't threaten "jobs" however it does threaten mundane, repetitive and boring resource management requirements. This in turn helps to support the growth of personal freedom and self esteem and inspires creativity which can lead to new and more fulfilling and rewarding opportunities.

Who will maintain the roads?

As people loose faith in the system it's ability to tax its members reduces and eventually it will be unable to continue maintaining public services. It's important that when this begins to happen that there is a critical mass of people that have the ability to carry out large-scale organisation together. We can see that we're close to this happening now by an all-time low in voting; a lack of voters shows a lack of confidence in the system.

What if there is a better way of doing things?

We believe that there is a better way of doing things than the current model, but we do not have the "silver bullet" nor will there ever be a "fixed" solution. Our stand is that solutions should evolve organically as required from the "bottom up" and that "better ways" shall become apparent and be implemented to suit the circumstances, events and times. (All aspects changeable)

Wouldn't it be more effective to engage in activism?

Rather than putting energy into breaking down structures we disagree with and protesting, wouldn't it be better to develop alternatives instead and increase the level of harmony in society?

How is the software aspect of the project connected to the setting up of organisations?

Can the OrganicDesign system be used by commercial businesses to make money?

How can a computer program embody spiritual principles?

Spiritual principles are centred around our relationships with others, and in the context of organisations and civilisation, the way entities relate to one another is a reflection of their systems. If the systems have spiritually oriented values designed into their bottom lines, as the Platform specification is being developed to do, then those systems embody spiritual principles, and in turn any software architecture designed to support these systems also embody those principles.

Some of us have been waiting nearly ten years for this "new software"! why's it taking so long?

How's a computer program supposed to help with the imminent economic collapse? people will be fighting for survival not tapping away at keyboards!